NetFilter
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: iptables NEW TABLE request. WAS[Re: Catching un-DNAT'ed packets]

To: Покотиленко Костик <casper@meteor.dp.ua>
Subject: Re: iptables NEW TABLE request. WAS[Re: Catching un-DNAT'ed packets]
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:02:32 +0100 (MET)
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: netfilter-list1@securepoint.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0701301145530.23321@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
List-archive: </pipermail/netfilter>
List-help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-id: General discussion and user questions <netfilter.lists.netfilter.org>
List-post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1167054030.16171.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> <459102EC.50402@plouf.fr.eu.org> <1169810473.8286.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1170086305.11285.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0701301145530.23321@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
On Jan 30 2007 11:46, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>Excuse me for double asking, but is this the place for such a feature
>>request?
>
>At least it's not the wrong place.

For the mailinglist record, the solutions is:

  -t nat -A POSTROUTING -m conntrack --ctstate DNAT --ctorigdst x.x.x.x


Jan
-- 
ft: http://freshmeat.net/p/chaostables/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>