NetFilter
[Top] [All Lists]

Whats faster? multiple rules vs. multiport match

To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Whats faster? multiple rules vs. multiport match
From: Maximilian Wilhelm <max@rfc2324.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:37:29 +0100
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: netfilter-list1@securepoint.com
List-archive: </pipermail/netfilter>
List-help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-id: General discussion and user questions <netfilter.lists.netfilter.org>
List-post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Hi!

While hacking on alff [42] I asked myself what would be more wise to
use for matching multiple ports on multiple servers/ips

 a) on rule for every ip/port combination
 b) two rules for every server, one for tcp and one for udp
    (assumend I only have to match for udp and tcp stuff).

(The whole scenario is the following:
 I generate rules to regulate access to different services.
 Every service is transalted into an own chain.
 Therein I generate a matrix of host running this service and port
 related to it - like a))

As there are some services with ~ 20 ports (think: Windows(r) DC)
there might be some advantage in choosing the faster way.

Is there any "benchmark" which might enligthen me which way to use?
Any comments?

Thanks in advance
Ciao
Max
-- 
        Follow the white penguin.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>