NetFilter
[Top] [All Lists]

creating artificial latency

To: "Netfilter List" <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: creating artificial latency
From: "Abdul-Wahid Paterson" <abdulwahid@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 11:42:46 +0300
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: netfilter-list1@securepoint.com
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=XNQvqPXpqSLh+/OUq6Ipa1n1iTZZ4TJJXE5SMJx/xJo7jOuRM+k2jWkZvS/8RednVhG7mMCUREfqB8s5uZkpPwiX46loEBlZamsrZeclUv/w9M3oRe4/TliCQTdn+YY8M5Pyl0LgVq7/LCWrTFG8pBF4PRww17d70LH2zB01ef8=
List-archive: </pipermail/netfilter>
List-help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-id: General discussion and user questions <netfilter.lists.netfilter.org>
List-post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
It is probably not the normal thing that people would want to slow
down packets but I have to remote sites and have a few different
options for connecting them. There is no copper or fibre so I am
restricted to certain wireless and satellite systems.

I know what the latency of these proposed systems would be but I need
to make a realistic evaluation of the different systems in terms of
using our in house applications to test what latency would be
acceptable for users to actually work effectively.

Is there a way using iptables (or another linux method) that I can
create artificial latency by adding say 500 msecs to each packet
before it is forwarded?

Thanks and regards,


Abdul-Wahid


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>