NetFilter
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: creating artificial latency

To: "Frederik Deweerdt" <deweerdt@free.fr>, "Netfilter List" <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: creating artificial latency
From: "Abdul-Wahid Paterson" <abdulwahid@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:42:07 +0300
Cc:
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: netfilter-list1@securepoint.com
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Y6LOPwD1pntTLTVmRrp5UAr11Ks+p/g+ujf/YvlqcWkzg342YhAzq39T4vw3YnOGfJFtzwadC+qYM2eSvpYwLZah5/BRH5ByRZxwYYYdDm+rgWPYHMhj0JCmLFf0FHlfvsoUHT0logZrfKl/mQjuezQ76gy2jY9oZzdVfLL/94E=
In-reply-to: <20070218090405.GF32060@slug>
List-archive: </pipermail/netfilter>
List-help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-id: General discussion and user questions <netfilter.lists.netfilter.org>
List-post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <995fcdb00702170042u478d6c2arf139d4f05ac6164c@mail.gmail.com> <20070218090405.GF32060@slug>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Thanks...found it....that looks like what  I need.

Abdul-Wahid

On 2/18/07, Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@free.fr> wrote:
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 11:42:46AM +0300, Abdul-Wahid Paterson wrote:
> It is probably not the normal thing that people would want to slow
> down packets but I have to remote sites and have a few different
> options for connecting them. There is no copper or fibre so I am
> restricted to certain wireless and satellite systems.
>
> I know what the latency of these proposed systems would be but I need
> to make a realistic evaluation of the different systems in terms of
> using our in house applications to test what latency would be
> acceptable for users to actually work effectively.
>
> Is there a way using iptables (or another linux method) that I can
> create artificial latency by adding say 500 msecs to each packet
> before it is forwarded?
Hi,

Google for "netem and delay".

Regards,
Frederik




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>