| To: | "Frederik Deweerdt" <deweerdt@free.fr>, "Netfilter List" <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: creating artificial latency |
| From: | "Abdul-Wahid Paterson" <abdulwahid@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:42:07 +0300 |
| Cc: | |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | netfilter-list1@securepoint.com |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Y6LOPwD1pntTLTVmRrp5UAr11Ks+p/g+ujf/YvlqcWkzg342YhAzq39T4vw3YnOGfJFtzwadC+qYM2eSvpYwLZah5/BRH5ByRZxwYYYdDm+rgWPYHMhj0JCmLFf0FHlfvsoUHT0logZrfKl/mQjuezQ76gy2jY9oZzdVfLL/94E= |
| In-reply-to: | <20070218090405.GF32060@slug> |
| List-archive: | </pipermail/netfilter> |
| List-help: | <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help> |
| List-id: | General discussion and user questions <netfilter.lists.netfilter.org> |
| List-post: | <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org> |
| List-subscribe: | <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <995fcdb00702170042u478d6c2arf139d4f05ac6164c@mail.gmail.com> <20070218090405.GF32060@slug> |
| Sender: | netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org |
Thanks...found it....that looks like what I need. Abdul-Wahid On 2/18/07, Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@free.fr> wrote: On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 11:42:46AM +0300, Abdul-Wahid Paterson wrote: > It is probably not the normal thing that people would want to slow > down packets but I have to remote sites and have a few different > options for connecting them. There is no copper or fibre so I am > restricted to certain wireless and satellite systems. > > I know what the latency of these proposed systems would be but I need > to make a realistic evaluation of the different systems in terms of > using our in house applications to test what latency would be > acceptable for users to actually work effectively. > > Is there a way using iptables (or another linux method) that I can > create artificial latency by adding say 500 msecs to each packet > before it is forwarded? Hi, Google for "netem and delay". Regards, Frederik |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: creating artificial latency, Frederik Deweerdt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Whats faster? multiple rules vs. multiport match, Jan Engelhardt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: creating artificial latency, Frederik Deweerdt |
| Next by Thread: | Netfilter rule notation and rule parsers, René Pfeiffer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |