NetFilter
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re IPv6 MARK support

To: mael.boutin@laposte.net
Subject: Re: Re IPv6 MARK support
From: Yasuyuki KOZAKAI <yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:53:22 +0900 (JST)
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: netfilter-list1@securepoint.com
In-reply-to: <2acb06d50702280155x6b6f89e3o89097e070880ae3e@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: </pipermail/netfilter>
List-help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-id: General discussion and user questions <netfilter.lists.netfilter.org>
List-post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <2acb06d50702280004r5dae5aa1p6fb1f0bc9543a3d3@mail.gmail.com> <2acb06d50702280155x6b6f89e3o89097e070880ae3e@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Hi,

From: "Boutin Maël" <mael.boutin@laposte.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:55:01 +0100

> After some tests, it appears that it is the OUTPUT chain that does not
> work. Indeed with the PREROUTING chain the mark is taken into account
> by iproute and the packet is routed as indicated in the corresponding
> tables.
> 
> Is it a bug or something i missed ?

I suspect IPv6 routing. But for conformation, can you try

        ip6tables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -m mark --mark 0x1 -j LOG --log-prefix 
"out6 "
        ip6tables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m mark --mark 0x1 -j LOG 
--log-prefix "post6 "

after your rules and check whether you can see some log by LOG target ?
And do you have any chance to try 2.6.20 ?

-- Yasuyuki Kozakai


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>