Sietse van Zanen wrote: Uh, no I think I may be wrong here. That might only count for NAT packets.The 600.000 bytes might be due to compression. How did you download the file? Just discovered that that was the right values, but of the upload! :) I was wrong because now, with the right "download" rule (so a rule that see the traffic "to" and not from the test machine)! -Sietse Thanks, Michele |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: bytes count question, Sietse van Zanen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: bytes count question, Jan Engelhardt |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: bytes count question, Sietse van Zanen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: bytes count question, Jan Engelhardt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |