| To: | spaminator@web.de |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Debian 2.6.8/bridge/iptables/passive ftp |
| From: | Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> |
| Date: | Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:29:33 +0200 (MEST) |
| Cc: | netfilter@lists.netfilter.org |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | netfilter-list1@securepoint.com |
| In-reply-to: | <361462969@web.de> |
| List-archive: | </pipermail/netfilter> |
| List-help: | <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help> |
| List-id: | General discussion and user questions <netfilter.lists.netfilter.org> |
| List-post: | <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org> |
| List-subscribe: | <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <361462969@web.de> |
| Sender: | netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org |
On Apr 4 2007 12:18, spaminator@web.de wrote: > >Rebooting the bridge box left me again with an unloaded ip_conntrack_ftp. So I >made an entry in /etc/modules which caters for the module to be loaded on >(re)boot. Strange thing that, because other modules related to iptables are >being loaded automatically, although they are not compiled into the kernel >too. Are there other "surprise"-modules that have to be loaded via >/etc/modules? ip_nat_* ip_conntrack_* * = irc, nat, h323, etc. look into your /lib/modules dir. Jan -- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Debian 2.6.8/bridge/iptables/passive ftp, spaminator |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Debian 2.6.8/bridge/iptables/passive ftp, Martijn Lievaart |
| Previous by Thread: | Debian 2.6.8/bridge/iptables/passive ftp, spaminator |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Debian 2.6.8/bridge/iptables/passive ftp, Martijn Lievaart |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |