NetFilter
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: packets to local addresses

To: Martijn Lievaart <m@rtij.nl>
Subject: Re: packets to local addresses
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 20:40:39 +0200 (MEST)
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org, MKS <rekordmeister@gmail.com>
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: netfilter-list1@securepoint.com
In-reply-to: <4617BC88.102@rtij.nl>
List-archive: </pipermail/netfilter>
List-help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-id: General discussion and user questions <netfilter.lists.netfilter.org>
List-post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <fad2fb270704060522r4322a223g4e2e40605b3fb6a@mail.gmail.com> <46167157.3080409@rtij.nl> <fad2fb270704070713w37a73f82o3caaf14f987a0f7a@mail.gmail.com> <4617BC88.102@rtij.nl>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
On Apr 7 2007 17:45, Martijn Lievaart wrote:
> MKS wrote:
>> What is the best way to change this behaviour, that is force "general"
>> packets out a specific interface. iptables route target???
>
> Dunno. Maybe the ROUTE target can be of assistence. As I said earlier, hping2
> probably can do this.

Use MARK and iproute2.

Jan
-- 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>