| To: | netfilter@lists.netfilter.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Port forwarding without masquerading..??? |
| From: | dummy@sapmail.pg.com |
| Date: | Sun, 27 May 2007 20:21:36 -0600 (MDT) |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | netfilter-list1@securepoint.com |
| Importance: | Normal |
| List-archive: | </pipermail/netfilter> |
| List-help: | <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help> |
| List-id: | General discussion and user questions <netfilter.lists.netfilter.org> |
| List-post: | <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org> |
| List-subscribe: | <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org |
| User-agent: | SquirrelMail/1.4.6-rc1 |
All, I am changing data centers and want to forward traffic hitting server A to Server B in another data center. I was using masquerading and it was working fine, however a problem has popped its ugly head. Server B needs to know the IP address of the client connecting to it. If it gets forwarded through Server A, the IP address of Server A is what is given. I tried to make this work without masquerading but I break the port forwarding. I've also Googled myself silly. Any thoughts? TIA, Q |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Newbies questions compiling uClinux-dist-20070130 with m68k-uclinux-tools-20061214, Francisco Perea |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | T1 router and multiple public ips, jamil egdemir |
| Previous by Thread: | Newbies questions compiling uClinux-dist-20070130 with m68k-uclinux-tools-20061214, Francisco Perea |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Port forwarding without masquerading..???, Pascal Hambourg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |