| To: | netfilter@lists.netfilter.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Restricting applications/protocols to use specific ports using iptables, is this possible |
| From: | "Elvir Kuric" <omasnjak@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:37:07 +0200 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | netfilter-list1@securepoint.com |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=XnGMyyypnUTRhEQdE7vfNV9qh9KcLZzj8L85NtaRuHuyYx+QxW65A1E84g35GTltflA3IKJXTekqibs33QIXwRZ8eSuWyeowVALT5TwH25cxS+KU6sjzIYyrIE564QIckh/XetYfgvh5SrOJvR0/yN0bZ3E/Q+P/3MU0soM/EbI= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=fhyLeYx8sDciU/fl+d6/ghlqC29XBHfPudRCnHj6pqHsXesgZJMumRPQodpQYi7MmCQPgvz36K+gJmNS/zLtELcLga+mDA4Y/qJNaUQirCh9CLwlxIX667gQOlAM/eE++2GNVt1BnUumVi9Wr5oTgrrfrMojmXlHssPWZk5SQ08= |
| List-archive: | </pipermail/netfilter> |
| List-help: | <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help> |
| List-id: | General discussion and user questions <netfilter.lists.netfilter.org> |
| List-post: | <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org> |
| List-subscribe: | <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org |
Hi all, I am interested in one thing, is possible using iptables software limit particular application/protocol to use/bind to particular ports. For example I want to send all reqestes from my machine using ports I specify, not random ones, or accept ping echo-replay on specific ports. Any idea or hint is welcome Best wishes, Elvir Kuric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: SNAT before IPSec, Jorge Davila |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: SNAT before IPSec, Grant Taylor |
| Previous by Thread: | problem matching marked packets in nat PREROUTING chain, Richard Hauswald |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Restricting applications/protocols to use specific ports using iptables, is this possible, Marc Haber |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |