| To: | "noa levy" <noalevy@gmail.com>,netfilter@lists.netfilter.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: SNAT before IPSec |
| From: | Jorge Davila <davila@nicaraguaopensource.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:15:21 -0600 |
| Cc: | |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | netfilter-list1@securepoint.com |
| In-reply-to: | <8bd3dfad0706050529s484d42b6t9ef4ae0fd1730367@mail.gmail.com> |
| List-archive: | </pipermail/netfilter> |
| List-help: | <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help> |
| List-id: | General discussion and user questions <netfilter.lists.netfilter.org> |
| List-post: | <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org> |
| List-subscribe: | <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <8bd3dfad0706050529s484d42b6t9ef4ae0fd1730367@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org |
I'm guessing that you can use the "normal" approach and apply the SNAT rules
to the outgoing traffic flowing in the ipsec interfaces.
The ipsec encryption algorithm is a kernel space tool and iptables is a user space tool to the netfilter kernel module. All traffic that pass the POSTROUTING chain in the NAT table is leaving the firewall box (through a physical interface e.g.:eth0 or through a virtual interface e.g.:ipsec0). Jorge Davila.. On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:29:47 +0300 "noa levy" <noalevy@gmail.com> wrote: Hi All, I have a setup where I need to SNAT traffic that will be going out via an IPSec tunnel. The NAT must take place before the IPSec encryption+encapsulation, so I need the packet to first go through SNAT and then match an IPSec policy. After being IPSec-ified, I need the packets to go through routing again. My question: SNAT takes place in POST_ROUTING. Can IPSec be applied after that? I have read that after IPSec the packet gets injected to LOCAL_OUT again, but when does the actual IPSec policy decision take place? Won't it happen *before* SNAT? Can I control it? Thanks, Noa Jorge Isaac Davila Lopez Nicaragua Open Source +505 430 5462 davila@nicaraguaopensource.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: problem matching marked packets in nat PREROUTING chain, Pascal Hambourg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: SNAT before IPSec, noa levy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: SNAT before IPSec, Grant Taylor |
| Next by Thread: | Re: SNAT before IPSec, noa levy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |