NetFilter
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SNAT before IPSec

To: Mail List - Netfilter <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: SNAT before IPSec
From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:28:33 -0500
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: netfilter-list1@securepoint.com
In-reply-to: <web-74829660@bk1.webmaillogin.com>
List-archive: </pipermail/netfilter>
List-help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-id: General discussion and user questions <netfilter.lists.netfilter.org>
List-post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Riverview Technologies Inc.
References: <8bd3dfad0706050529s484d42b6t9ef4ae0fd1730367@mail.gmail.com> <web-74829660@bk1.webmaillogin.com>
Reply-to: gtaylor+reply@riverviewtech.net
Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070511 Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
On 06/05/07 15:15, Jorge Davila wrote:
I'm guessing that you can use the "normal" approach and apply the SNAT rules to the outgoing traffic flowing in the ipsec interfaces.

...

All traffic that pass the POSTROUTING chain in the NAT table is leaving the firewall box (through a physical interface e.g.:eth0 or through a virtual interface e.g.:ipsec0).

Um, correct me if I'm wrong, but not all IPSec implementations create an interface any more.



Grant. . . .


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>