Absolutely!
That would be even better. That way, if I accidentally closed a
remote shell, or if I were doing several scp's in a row, I could
reuse the same connection several times without it hanging around
unnecessarily.
JP
On Jan 30, 2007, at 6:09 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
Would you settle for a timeout -- letting the master background itself
but then disconnect after a period of inactivity which you can
configure
as low as you like, and which I can set to infinite?
--
"NOTICE: This E-mail (including attachments) is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention,
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited, Please reply to the sender that you have
received the message in error, then delete it. Thank you."
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@mindrot.org
http://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
|