| To: | brian@highstream.kicks-ass.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Qmail-Ldap Performance |
| From: | Toni Mueller <support@oeko.net> |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:58:14 +0100 |
| Cc: | qmail-ldap@qmail-ldap.org |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | qmail-ldap-list@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail-ldap@qmail-ldap.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.62.0610261006310.21294@distort> |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-ldap-help@qmail-ldap.org; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <4540C026.7000408@paranacidade.org.br> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0610261006310.21294@distort> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.4i |
Hi, On Thu, 26.10.2006 at 10:11:44 -0400, brian@highstream.kicks-ass.org <brian@highstream.kicks-ass.org> wrote: > No offense but why are you even running qmail-ldap with that few mail > boxes? qmail-ldap gives me "ease of administration" in a way I've yet to see in any other MTA (though I'm not searching much). Combine that with the speed and reliabilty of qmail, and you're there. FWIW, I'd also use qmail-ldap for a three-user office box for these reasons. Best, --Toni++ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | per users smtp databytes option, satish patel |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: per users smtp databytes option, Toni Mueller |
| Previous by Thread: | per users smtp databytes option, satish patel |
| Next by Thread: | Qmail administration, satish patel |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |