| To: | qmail-ldap@qmail-ldap.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | SMTPAUTH Anonomous ldap bind only? |
| From: | "Scott Ryan" <scottlryan@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:15:01 +0200 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | qmail-ldap-list@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail-ldap@qmail-ldap.org |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Q7P1KoqWS6kUjlIjvGRWEQkAxJuL7zNYNTjFEIdcsKcp+TiqUD6nOsQY6mPmJ6ead95ut1xYHSjdKdM6IcLbmfyw7Gg2OKssORcJ1AbyLsbomDxAo1b5c5vGbLG1Pz8jajmjGMxUBzL1LwedBqqrM6L6wixEEaANvq8vXmPt5x0= |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-ldap-help@qmail-ldap.org; run by ezmlm |
|
I am implementing SMTPAUTH and what I have found is that authentication is constantly failing. However, the user can pop their account without any problems with the same username and password. When I debugged my ldap logs I found the following: Jan 30 16:28:11 himalia slapd2.3[2753]: conn=17962824 fd=46 ACCEPT from IP=192.168.223.100:47944 (IP=0.0.0.0:389) Jan 30 16:28:11 himalia slapd2.3[2753]: conn=17962824 op=0 BIND dn="" method=128 Jan 30 16:28:11 himalia slapd2.3[2753]: conn=17962824 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text= Jan 30 16:28:11 himalia slapd2.3[2753]: conn=17962824 op=1 SRCH base="ou=mail,dc=cybertrade,dc=co,dc=za,dc=isp" scope=2 deref=0 filter="(uid=gareth1)" Jan 30 16:28:11 himalia slapd2.3[2753]: conn=17962824 op=1 SRCH attr=accountStatus userPassword Jan 30 16:28:11 himalia slapd2.3[2753]: conn=17962824 op=1 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0 nentries=0 text= Jan 30 16:28:11 himalia slapd2.3[2753]: conn=17962824 op=2 UNBIND Jan 30 16:28:11 himalia slapd2.3[2753]: conn=17962824 fd=46 closed Why is SMTP-AUTH binding with a blank dn? I thought that it should be binding with the dn stored in the ldaplogin control file # cd /var/qmail/control/ [miranda:/var/qmail/control]# cat ldaplogin cn=qmail,dc=cybertrade,dc=co,dc=za,dc=isp the userPassword attribute is not readable anonomously and therefore causing the failed authentication. Is this a bug or have I missed something completely here? -- slr |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: qmail-ldap + AD, Zdravko Stoychev |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | SMTPAUTH Anonomous ldap bind only?, Scott Ryan |
| Previous by Thread: | Delayed mail delivery problem?, Zdravko Stoychev |
| Next by Thread: | SMTPAUTH Anonomous ldap bind only?, Scott Ryan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |