Qmail-LDAP
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Greetdelay patch

To: qmail-ldap@qmail-ldap.org
Subject: Re: Greetdelay patch
From: Felipe Augusto van de Wiel <felipe@paranacidade.org.br>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:21:00 -0200
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: qmail-ldap-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail-ldap@qmail-ldap.org
In-reply-to: <45C1DB8E.9080106@fct.unl.pt>
Mailing-list: contact qmail-ldap-help@qmail-ldap.org; run by ezmlm
Organization: SEDU/PARANACIDADE
References: <45C1DB8E.9080106@fct.unl.pt>
Reply-to: qmail-ldap@qmail-ldap.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061219 Iceape/1.0.7 (Debian-1.0.7-2)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/01/2007 10:22 AM, Hugo Monteiro wrote:
> Hello all,
> I've ported John M. Simpson's qmail greetdelay patch to qmail-ldap.

        Thanks. :)


> here is the README file:

[...]

> Coments are welcomed!

        Any false-positives so far?  I always listen that the
delay of SMTP greeting reduces a lot of SPAM incoming and that
it won't affect real MTAs, but as always, we find out that some
server uses really strange MTAs (or customizations), so if you
are using it, how is your impression about SPAM reduction and
false-positives?


> Regards,
> Hugo Monteiro.

        Kind regards,

- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel <felipe@paranacidade.org.br>
Coordenadoria de Tecnologia da Informação (CTI) - SEDU/PARANACIDADE
http://www.paranacidade.org.br/           Phone: (+55 41 3350 3300)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFwek7Cj65ZxU4gPQRAk4DAKDB2fTbPdnfQywu9Bm83KmL2fjk7wCfWE6f
IcXLGxENsoIOd0/t6ISSryg=
=vDKs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>