On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:46:23AM -0600, Mark Farver wrote:
> Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >On 02/14/2007 12:05 PM, Carlos wrote:
> >
> >>Hi peoples,
> >>
> >>I'm testing autorespond-2.0.4 with qmail-ldap.
> >>
> >
> > Why using autoresponder instead of the auto-reply
> >feature that comes with qmail-ldap?
> >
> >
>
> Using a external vacation program is a good idea. qmail-ldap's built in
> autoreply feature sends out a reply to every message sent. vacation
> does not sent out autoreplies to messages marked with "Precedence: bulk"
> (mailing list traffic) and only sends out a reply once per week for each
> unique From address. Blind autoreply systems like qmail-ldap's are the
> bane of any mailing list administrator and anti-spam people alike.
>
> I would be thankful if someone would add the above functionality to
> qmail-ldap.
>
Oh, come on! You should not start talking about stuff you have no clue
about. qmail-ldap's qmail-reply does not reply to messgages with:
a) specific users (eg. mailer-daemon)
b) present Precedence: field of junk, bulk or list
c) ignores mails with X-RBL: headers
d) ignores mails with X-Spam-Status: Yes
Additionaly if configured correctly qmail-reply will only send one reply
to a specific user in two weeks. Btw. this feature was enabled by default
in Nov. 2003.
So all the stuff you are criticizing is not valid.
--
:wq Claudio
|