Qmail-LDAP
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Some anti-spam patches

To: qmail-ldap@qmail-ldap.org
Subject: Re: Some anti-spam patches
From: "sato x" <gladiol4@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 09:56:18 +0700
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: qmail-ldap-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail-ldap@qmail-ldap.org
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=RKgdwSn1dULjopXVjZj30o1dI14By91GEMndvc+Wrq1gX++ZGtc4gXDqg+Q4T+mjl+y43+6KkpFftgtT3cHJ0vxkR7mgEoi+0GmxvJKpyUBmE2WEx6fOpGV2i3XfYn861gh7nl/qv457OBr6r2jhxOxlqRPU+098pQ5V0e6Uvhw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=DPys2vq4Tq/0zuEqcDcmm9FHjBQPHWY3lyvP2Us1m5RMYnswSKhUYOvlDFSJeUvd4e+oe+m1ftzndYU3o8BW7MIYGFcSG1+cq47VTPb4m5Q8v8iS4ZiFX2fwSvkhG7oZD9QGUgPweJJtO9jwmzXstO29FOcp6H0mHMHKm+cPkUs=
In-reply-to: <200703071833.02411.bajnokk@niif.hu>
Mailing-list: contact qmail-ldap-help@qmail-ldap.org; run by ezmlm
References: <200703071833.02411.bajnokk@niif.hu>

Doesn't qmail already have the reverse DNS stuff within it, does it? Or maybe it belongs to tcpserver? I see it in the /service/qmail-smtpd/run file (the -h option) in our existing mail server. And about "Bad RCPT TO delay", if I'm not mistaken, I'd read something about it in www.jms1.net. The guy that manages that site using it in his own qmail server. But, maybe I was wrong - pardon me for that mistakes. Good luck to you.

Best regards,

sato

On 3/8/07, Kristof Bajnok <bajnokk@niif.hu> wrote:
Hi,

due to the recent spam activities I needed to develop some functionality
into qmail-ldap.

New things are (documented in Wiki):
* Required reverse DNS ( http://www.qmail-ldap.org/wiki/REQPTR)
* Bad RCPT TO delay (http://www.qmail-ldap.org/wiki/BADRCPTDELAY)
* Domain aliasing support ( http://www.qmail-ldap.org/wiki/Domain_aliasing)

(Especially the latter I did miss so long time ago!)

Some limited testing done, no warranty, of course.

Feel free to question or comment!

Kristof

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>