Qmail-LDAP
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Does qmail-ldap have its own spam filter??

To: qmail-ldap@qmail-ldap.org
Subject: Re: Does qmail-ldap have its own spam filter??
From: "sato x" <gladiol4@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:49:13 +0700
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: qmail-ldap-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail-ldap@qmail-ldap.org
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=H3LAxYnFdBJjhQwZ6WtStOrLDFFROlwpKTLyxsiev4trIvdzVSVsZqO6ma3ppj6Ct5Bu3Uelx2gBhWYHmK1ZW3I8IThcK7CaTRjg+ysaaVbXeen8hm20a6GUA4RLx5GZXOCIonBwzrt1JjZjVyTHQSLK40c8POkJCiY8EbUKkRs=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=nSYH85ctojAAHwyl0ArdaKcwOW2Zf5kn5nWkcQriP3HtUgxsGs+u8+ubfgXrOSwYLKzh0OB+L8rdhNfv0JmYMqqMf0pqR88Dvz6/RebrOMB2y/gdG8DyfOJUDm0AIW3EfR6VKvPd06u7nPj6fTNcjxNxAokTkJAo2bu9yJOFcg8=
In-reply-to: <878xdzk0hd.fsf@pumba.bayour.com>
Mailing-list: contact qmail-ldap-help@qmail-ldap.org; run by ezmlm
References: <f5ba7b270703062350u63be8cf8j2ca80f1453c004e6@mail.gmail.com> <878xdzk0hd.fsf@pumba.bayour.com>
Thank you very much for the information.

Best regards,

sato

On 3/15/07, Turbo Fredriksson <turbo@bayour.com> wrote:
Quoting "sato x" <gladiol4@gmail.com>:

>    Hi all,
>    I recently entered this url,
>     http://unix.freshmeat.net/projects/qmail-ldap/?branch_id=8641&release_
>    id=137690, and read that qmail has "state-of-the art spam filters".

It doesn't say it 'has' spam filters. It say 'there is'... The not-said
part is 'availible as third party ad-ons'...

>    Does the spam filter hide somewhere in the source code of qmail-ldap or
>    should I add spamassasin and clamAV?

In my opinion, yes. But there ARE 'some kind of' anti-spam. It's called
RCPTCHECK and RBL. They are both environment variables that you set before
starting qmail. Check the manual...

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>