| To: | qmail-ldap@qmail-ldap.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Qmailadmin and qmail-ldap - is it possible? |
| From: | "sato x" <gladiol4@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:06:27 +0700 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | qmail-ldap-list@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail-ldap@qmail-ldap.org |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=XDCwbISy0reGQ/QdZnRJiF7J21oY2E95Kqi7zL5dOV/upbfU+N5uSUn7vcofxodyLKr/yXXjGOZAwadOjmW0fMV4ykDKoYFLNtG76/yvDNKA33qj1opzK8xtbAEODD25dYv+mnBNsrHam0ZWoiQ1sOgSNEVYhzfweqF85pzUuJI= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=pUO5qWmSla6AIclOlvCyFpviRyHO2c6ZbIUIic+Bx6eQPfSgZzG3vh1URqrRVDtia8U6pMkxEmSts0GXhY/1TVnbfYSsZRH4F2KinWi8qNP8KYLs7ioP5rCtzXrshzypeq5bcfVVRofHApRuaA8qd65w+nGWVJMuYgczxrHjssc= |
| In-reply-to: | <45FECBD8.50809@dwalliance.com> |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-ldap-help@qmail-ldap.org; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <f5ba7b270703190605m1db15de3j2dea3c61087706b8@mail.gmail.com> <op.tpfyxp013s6uth@eagle.lan> <45FECBD8.50809@dwalliance.com> |
|
Thank you for your suggestion. I will try one by one. :) Best regards, sato |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Qmailadmin and qmail-ldap - is it possible?, Jimmy Brake |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Compile qmail-ldap-control in Fedora 6 environment (GCC 4.1.1 has bug?), Turbo Fredriksson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Qmailadmin and qmail-ldap - is it possible?, Jimmy Brake |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Qmailadmin and qmail-ldap - is it possible?, sato x |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |