In my configuration my server
is qmail-ldap I install simscan because faster and
only scan virus for intermail mail and I install Smtp
gateway with postfix+ spamassasin+amavisd+clamav
for incoming mail from internet, and You can
build Smtp gateway with qmail
Thanks
From: Scott Ryan
[mailto:scottlryan@gmail.com]
Sent: 23 May 2007 16:57
To: sato x
Cc: qmail-ldap@qmail-ldap.org
Subject: Re: Which one is better:
qmail-scanner or simscan?
qmail-scanner is slow.
simple as. If you are saying that your qmail-ldap server is slow then you are
doing something wrong.
I use qscanq which is very quick.
On 5/23/07, sato x
<gladiol4@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi ...
I read somewhere saying that simscan (written in C) was better than
qmail-scanner (written in pearl). But according to my experience, it's
not true (pardon my stupidity), because my qmail-ldap server, with
simscan+clamav+spamassassin, is slower than the qmail server, with
qmail-scanner+clamav+spamassassin. Slower means the time the server
took to process incoming emails.
Actually it really doesn't matter anymore since I had decided to scan
emails come from other domain only. But I am just curious with the
fact I notice above and I want to make sure that there's nothing wrong
with my qmail-ldap configuration. Thanx before.
sato
--
slr