| To: | qmail-ldap@qmail-ldap.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Which one is better: qmail-scanner or simscan? |
| From: | "sato x" <gladiol4@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 May 2007 14:44:01 +0700 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | qmail-ldap-list@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail-ldap@qmail-ldap.org |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gqH7NOstkbx16tCVcjWe4dUTdPgNDBlzikY4krdEntKF3oC208nH43HeHHGKRXfQIsrXFvnyekT+Ag+OFtcodCBeSRlPT/htnYT27o28MjrE84LAtpQplOQmIlnx/IwqXqHC4nfqS9uAW8JvTLeUtYtIFWJu2Ur6/ozMZr/v8b0= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ghYKACr/DHbRtWRXW21Ol1qOI9jABqf4DAOQMuQSZbuE2IEKdnT5CAZFp16Kkh0mqg7PKCPnYjDq9KFW7XCj9zvttt3Vv+7CPp7u0aNRU/FACHucLxP8JLGU+YGC/gfCbkI3gSPqtyiwOClzAs5vc1U8voZtx0Za9uUqiCw+Pdk= |
| In-reply-to: | <4654f7ee.59b922c4.05fd.5d79SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-ldap-help@qmail-ldap.org; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <6bf71c520705230256n2725d67w4e798223c27de0aa@mail.gmail.com> <4654f7ee.59b922c4.05fd.5d79SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> |
Thanx for all the responses. Then I guess I have homeworks to do to check my simscan installation. Best regards, sato |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Which one is better: qmail-scanner or simscan?, Rony |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | AUTHREQUIRED, Aiko Barz |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Which one is better: qmail-scanner or simscan?, Rony |
| Next by Thread: | AUTHREQUIRED, Aiko Barz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |