| To: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Is saferead not really safe on Solaris 8? |
| From: | "Matthew R. Dempsky" <mrd@alkemio.org> |
| Date: | Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:59:05 -0600 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| In-reply-to: | <20061124.191156.02469879.hanche@math.ntnu.no> |
| Mail-followup-to: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <20061124.191156.02469879.hanche@math.ntnu.no> |
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 07:11:56PM +0100, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote: > Surely, if select() said there is data, then read() cannot hang? Not entirely true: select() can only say the readability/writability of fds at time of call. If some other process reads the data before qmail-smtpd, then qmail-smtpd could hang. Are you using any 3rd-party wrapper programs that are invoked between tcpserver and qmail-smtpd? That's my only guess beyond an OS bug. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Is saferead not really safe on Solaris 8?, Harald Hanche-Olsen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Is saferead not really safe on Solaris 8?, Harald Hanche-Olsen |
| Previous by Thread: | Is saferead not really safe on Solaris 8?, Harald Hanche-Olsen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Is saferead not really safe on Solaris 8?, Harald Hanche-Olsen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |