| To: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Question about Qmail relating to MX retry processing |
| From: | Harald Hanche-Olsen <hanche@math.ntnu.no> |
| Date: | Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:18:09 +0100 (CET) |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| In-reply-to: | <456789E5.3000508@gatworks.com> |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <45676987.2050808@perkel.com> <456789E5.3000508@gatworks.com> |
+ Uncle George <qmail@gatworks.com>: | As eventually you will find that the errant spammers will find the | hole in your filtering scheme, and not bother with the lowest [...] AFAIK, this is already the case. Much spam is sent directly to an MX other than the lowest numbered one, without bothering with the lowest one at all. Imagine that - spammers intentionally violating Internet protocols! 8-) - Harald |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Question about Qmail relating to MX retry processing, Harald Hanche-Olsen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Question about Qmail relating to MX retry processing, Uncle George |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Question about Qmail relating to MX retry processing, Adam McKenna |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Question about Qmail relating to MX retry processing, Marc Perkel |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |