| To: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Question about Qmail relating to MX retry processing |
| From: | "Matthew R. Dempsky" <mrd@alkemio.org> |
| Date: | Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:57:51 -0600 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| In-reply-to: | <20061125.105613.226722930.hanche@math.ntnu.no> |
| Mail-followup-to: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <45679726.9080600@perkel.com> <20061125041044.GA19046@discworld.dyndns.org> <00a901c71063$d76b7920$7e00a8c0@pawel> <20061125.105613.226722930.hanche@math.ntnu.no> |
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 10:56:13AM +0100, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote: > Be that as it may, changing qmail's behaviour on this issue would > probably be nontrivial, due to the way responsibility is divided up > between qmail-send and qmail-remote. Matthias Andree wrote a patch that changes this behavior[1]. [1] http://www-dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/qmail/patch-qmail-1.03-rfc2821.diff |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Question about Qmail relating to MX retry processing, Marc Perkel |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Advanced tricks I use to get rid of spam using MX 4xx, Marc Perkel |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Question about Qmail relating to MX retry processing, Markus Stumpf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Question about Qmail relating to MX retry processing, Marc Perkel |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |