| To: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to, dl@blackpacket.net, "Uncle George" <netbeans@gatworks.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Advanced tricks I use to get rid of spam using MX 4xx [X200611277046] |
| From: | "Maintenance Fees Inquiries" <MaintenanceFeesInquiries@USPTO.GOV> |
| Date: | Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:57:26 -0500 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| Thread-index: | AccSbwaZxs2mnOnoT7e4p1anoKcK/g== |
| Thread-topic: | Advanced tricks I use to get rid of spam using MX 4xx [X200611277046] |
Dear Uncle George,
Thank you for contacting the
Maintenance Fee Branch. You should receive a response within 2-3 business
days. The tracking number for your inquiry is X200611277046.
Maintenance Fee Branch
(571) 272-6500
-----Original Message-----
From: Uncle George [mailto:netbeans@gatworks.com]
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 4:56 PM
To: dl@blackpacket.net;qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Cc:
Subject: Re: Advanced tricks I use to get rid of spam using MX 4xx
> To provide reliable mail transmission, the SMTP client MUST be able
> to try (and retry) each of the relevant addresses in this list in
> order, until a delivery attempt succeeds.
I think you are missing the *MUST* in the first sentence. There is no
try of any other MX if a connection is made, but delivery fails for any
reason.
> If you look carefully, at the top of the RFC, "SHOULD" is defined:
The SHOULD addresses a configurable limit of MX tries.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Advanced tricks I use to get rid of spam using MX 4xx, Uncle George |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Advanced tricks I use to get rid of spam using MX 4xx, Larry Weldon |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Advanced tricks I use to get rid of spam using MX 4xx [X200611277031], Maintenance Fees Inquiries |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Qmail is clearly out of compliance with RFC282. [X200611277071], Maintenance Fees Inquiries |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |