| To: | dl@blackpacket.net |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Qmail is clearly out of compliance with RFC282. |
| From: | Marc Perkel <marc@perkel.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:42:28 -0800 |
| Cc: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| In-reply-to: | <456B5418.10708@blackpacket.net> |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <45676987.2050808@perkel.com> <456789E5.3000508@gatworks.com> <20061125.101809.193764004.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <45686D69.5040003@perkel.com> <20061127143127.GA29898@discworld.dyndns.org> <456B03BA.1060303@perkel.com> <456B5418.10708@blackpacket.net> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) |
From the other thread, the relevant RFC passage was quoted from RFC2821: To provide reliable mail transmission, the SMTP client MUST be able to try (and retry) each of the relevant addresses in this list in order, until a delivery attempt succeeds. Seems clear to me. Unless you want to argue what MUST means. However, there MAY also be a configurable limit on the number of alternate addresses that can be tried. In any case, the SMTP client SHOULD try at least two addresses.What this says is that if you decide to have some limits that the limits should be set at 2 or more. Since Qmail doesn't have a configurable limit then the MUST part applies. Clearly it is saying that in any case that at least 2 mx records must best tested. For some reason you are ignoring the plain language of the RFC. It could have been written more precisely but you really have to stretch to not get what it is clearly saying. Qmail is out of compliance with RFC282. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Advanced tricks I use to get rid of spam using MX 4xx, Larry Weldon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Qmail is clearly out of compliance with RFC282. [X200611277071], Maintenance Fees Inquiries |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Advanced tricks I use to get rid of spam using MX 4xx, DAve |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Qmail is clearly out of compliance with RFC282., Richard Archer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |