| To: | "Marc Perkel" <marc@perkel.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Qmail is clearly out of compliance with RFC282. [X200611277071] |
| From: | "Maintenance Fees Inquiries" <MaintenanceFeesInquiries@USPTO.GOV> |
| Date: | Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:45:45 -0500 |
| Cc: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| Thread-index: | AccSdcaIUHH/dZ+FSY+IGkTG6Eaosw== |
| Thread-topic: | Qmail is clearly out of compliance with RFC282. [X200611277071] |
Dear Marc Perkel,
Thank you for contacting the
Maintenance Fee Branch. You should receive a response within 2-3 business
days. The tracking number for your inquiry is X200611277071.
Maintenance Fee Branch
(571) 272-6500
-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Perkel [mailto:marc@perkel.com]
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 5:45 PM
To: dl@blackpacket.net
Cc: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Subject: Qmail is clearly out of compliance with RFC282.
From the other thread, the relevant RFC passage was quoted from RFC2821:
To provide reliable mail transmission, the SMTP client MUST be able
to try (and retry) each of the relevant addresses in this list in
order, until a delivery attempt succeeds.
Seems clear to me. Unless you want to argue what MUST means.
However, there MAY also
be a configurable limit on the number of alternate addresses that
can be tried. In any case, the SMTP client SHOULD try at least two
addresses.
What this says is that if you decide to have some limits that the limits
should be set at 2 or more. Since Qmail doesn't have a configurable
limit then the MUST part applies.
Clearly it is saying that in any case that at least 2 mx records must
best tested. For some reason you are ignoring the plain language of the
RFC. It could have been written more precisely but you really have to
stretch to not get what it is clearly saying.
Qmail is out of compliance with RFC282.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Qmail is clearly out of compliance with RFC282., Marc Perkel |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Advanced tricks I use to get rid of spam using MX 4xx, Marc Perkel |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Advanced tricks I use to get rid of spam using MX 4xx [X200611277046], Maintenance Fees Inquiries |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Advanced tricks I use to get rid of spam using MX 4xx [X200611277077], Maintenance Fees Inquiries |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |