Qmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Qmail is clearly out of compliance with RFC282.

To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Subject: Re: Qmail is clearly out of compliance with RFC282.
From: Richard Archer <rha@juggernaut.com.au>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:52:55 +1100
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: gmail-qmail@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: sp.com.list@gmail.com
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <456B69D4.3080005@perkel.com>
Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <45676987.2050808@perkel.com> <456789E5.3000508@gatworks.com> <20061125.101809.193764004.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <45686D69.5040003@perkel.com> <20061127143127.GA29898@discworld.dyndns.org> <456B03BA.1060303@perkel.com> <456B5418.10708@blackpacket.net> <456B69D4.3080005@perkel.com>
At 2:42 PM -0800 27/11/06, Marc Perkel wrote:

>Qmail is out of compliance with RFC282.

Hey, if you want to drop all mail from qmail servers into
the bit bucket, that's fine with me.

However if you want to run a reliable and useful service
then you need to accept the fact that qmail does what it
does and isn't going to change no matter how much you
whine about it. Just get on with the job of making your
system work within these known parameters.

 ...R.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>