| To: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: smtp keep-alive message possibility |
| From: | "d tbsky" <tbskyd@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:12:00 +0800 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VwOM/ucdEbdUTgR0/k0K2+jo6OTVe4J4yZQ2G8X/U5u9rAcAwNQGxfoWsQbSEDJRgaPqh34xuAMnJ2fAREQ7ItwqQbqY6kTyYbtw1LBQNor+yhoMeFP1UNUOajgykTPHUAi1RYGOYEGufeqQ4YO5B5cDrlB6KUfN2YYdNKVW1cE= |
| Domainkey-status: | good (test mode) |
| In-reply-to: | <D61E6D10-E3EB-4D07-B15F-11B4C626F913@intnet.co.cr> |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <49002b820612110217p491ba01at148675b9ba8c83b4@mail.gmail.com> <p06230910c1a2e77f277c@10.0.0.1> <D61E6D10-E3EB-4D07-B15F-11B4C626F913@intnet.co.cr> |
hi: qmail-scanner can skip clamav when encounter big mails. the default is 100M. we now set to 5 MB for safety.. i hope there is a better way... Regards, tbskyd 2006/12/12, Daniel Cañas Montero <dcm@intnet.co.cr>: On Dec 11, 2006, at 4:48 AM, Richard Archer wrote: > At 6:17 PM +0800 11/12/06, d tbsky wrote: > >> we use qmail-scanner and clamav for virus scans. it would >> take about 70 seconds to scan a 15 MB email. > > Clamav says: > > # Files in archives larger than this limit won't be scanned. > # Value of 0 disables the limit. > # Default: 10M > > Sounds like there's a good reason for that default :) > > ...R. > This option is for archives only. There is no mechanism in clamav to skip messages larger than a certain size. The user has to do that before passing the message to clamav. There also is the option "StreamMaxLength" but that closes the connection when the data size reaches the value specified. Resulting in the message being rejected. -- Daniel Alberto |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: smtp keep-alive message possibility, d tbsky |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Splitting off rejects and deferrals into separate log file with multilog?, Jeremy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: smtp keep-alive message possibility, Daniel Cañas Montero |
| Next by Thread: | Re: smtp keep-alive message possibility, Adi Pircalabu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |