Qmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fwd: Looking for Qmail Experts to help build an independent release

To: Jeremy Kister <qmail-05@jeremykister.com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Looking for Qmail Experts to help build an independent release of qmail [ot]]
From: dsr@tao.merseine.nu
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:26:07 -0500
Cc: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: gmail-qmail@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: sp.com.list@gmail.com
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <4592D40C.7010609@jeremykister.com>
Mail-followup-to: Jeremy Kister <qmail-05@jeremykister.com>, qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <4592D40C.7010609@jeremykister.com>
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 03:14:04PM -0500, Jeremy Kister wrote:
> after arguing on the qmail list a couple weeks back, Perkel is at it again.
> 
>> I personally don't like qmail. I think it might have been great in it's
>> day but its day was a decade ago. Now it is in a state of death by slow
>> rot. However, it still has a cult following. This list is running it and
>> it is MX broken. I'm going to fix it an publish the fixes so that qmail
>> can rejoin the RFC compliant community.

I place full faith and confidence in any programmer displaying
this attitude.

-dsr-


-- 
_.. ___ . ...   _ .... .   _. ... ._   ._. . ._ _..   _.__ ___ .._ ._.
__ ._ .. ._.. ..__..   _ .... .   .._. _... .. ..__..

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>