| To: | Qmail mailing list <qmail@list.cr.yp.to> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: qmail as a spam firewall |
| From: | Fabio Busatto <fabio.busatto@sikurezza.org> |
| Date: | Fri, 5 Jan 2007 21:11:28 +0100 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.BSF.4.44.0701051205190.93917-100000@richard2.pil.net> |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <Pine.BSF.4.44.0701051205190.93917-100000@richard2.pil.net> |
| Reply-to: | Qmail mailing list <qmail@list.cr.yp.to> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2i |
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:14:49PM -0500, up@3.am wrote: > Does control/smtproutes come into play BEFORE simscan (which rejects at > the smtp level) does? What about rblsmtpd? Not at all. Are you sure to tell simscan to reject spam instead of just marking? This may be a solution for the strange behavior of your server. rblsmtpd is good since you don't use smtp-auth or other authentication, if you need them working you should use the qmail-dnsbl patch instead. Bye Fabio |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: qmail as a spam firewall, up |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Christmas Gift for free] 50% Spam reduction !, Jeremy Kitchen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: qmail as a spam firewall, Joshua Megerman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: qmail as a spam firewall, up |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |