| To: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Christmas Gift for free] 50% Spam reduction ! |
| From: | Harald Hanche-Olsen <hanche@math.ntnu.no> |
| Date: | Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:22:33 +0100 (CET) |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| In-reply-to: | <3.0.6.32.20070127123440.00be7360@192.168.192.1> |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <45BA8723.9000708@nonstophate.com> <1169892015.45bb22afb0786@poczta.inet.pl> <3.0.6.32.20070127123440.00be7360@192.168.192.1> |
+ Erwin Hoffmann <feh@fehcom.de>: | 3. Don't forget: With GREETDELAY you consume connections for a | certain amount of time from bot-nets PCs. Thus, with this mean you | really suppress spams from those sources even to anyone else. This is well and good until enough sites do it to force the spammers to adapt. The next generation of botnet spam mailers will just have to open a large number of SMTP connections simultaneously and pay attention to protocol niceties in order to maintain throughput. Just another turn of the spiral in the war between spammers and the rest of us, I'm afraid. Someone please tell me I'm wrong. (With arguments of course. "You're wrong" doesn't cut it.) - Harald |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Christmas Gift for free] 50% Spam reduction !, Erwin Hoffmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Yet another smtp delayer, Paul J. Park |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Christmas Gift for free] 50% Spam reduction !, Erwin Hoffmann |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Christmas Gift for free] 50% Spam reduction !, Erwin Hoffmann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |