| Subject: | Re: dynamic ip: cold hard facts |
|---|---|
| From: | Uncle George <qmail@gatworks.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:40:45 -0500 |
| Cc: | qmail list <qmail@list.cr.yp.to> |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| In-reply-to: | <2E7086DF-58B3-4580-BEA9-E6E411A94E6D@ece.ufl.edu> |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <1170248320.6046.56.camel@tiger> <45C0969F.2060900@gatworks.com> <1170250777.6046.66.camel@tiger> <2E7086DF-58B3-4580-BEA9-E6E411A94E6D@ece.ufl.edu> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-6 (X11/20050513) |
I guess its a-ok to place the innocent in jail, merely because they fit the profile of all those other non-innocent folks. It it too much to ask for the elimination of dynamic ip's in its entirety. I'm sure that I can go on, but i'd rather get the attention of the FTC about the "unfair business practices". :) BTW let me know how it goes routing your mail through some other organization. jason kawaja wrote: i do (at least i trust rbl lists that say they are blocking them). the rare cases of legitimate email blocked do not outweigh the effectiveness of blocking the many illegitimate mails. people can relay their originated dynamic deliveries through a server provided by their ISP or similar, it's not too much to ask.-- Jason Kawaja, 2-4568 IT Expert, UF Dept of ECE |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: dynamic ip: cold hard facts, Matt Simpson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: dynamic ip: cold hard facts, jason kawaja |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: dynamic ip: cold hard facts, jason kawaja |
| Next by Thread: | Re: dynamic ip: cold hard facts, Charles Cazabon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |