| To: | qmail list <qmail@list.cr.yp.to> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: dynamic ip: cold hard facts |
| From: | Larry <lweldon@welcoin.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:57:34 -0500 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| In-reply-to: | <20070131144757.GA8507@discworld.dyndns.org> |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <1170248320.6046.56.camel@tiger> <45C0969F.2060900@gatworks.com> <1170250777.6046.66.camel@tiger> <2E7086DF-58B3-4580-BEA9-E6E411A94E6D@ece.ufl.edu> <20070131144757.GA8507@discworld.dyndns.org> |
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 08:47 -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > ISP-provided mail servers have gotten significantly worse over the last ten > years, to the point that simply saying "relay through your ISP's smarthost" is > no longer good advice. > That's a good point - decent email service to all customers is indeed essential. There are two entities to discuss: the residential or casual business user who doesn't care about a static IP and the commercial user who really needs a static IP and either can't buy one from the local ISP (I assume that's you Charles) or gets a static mixed into an otherwise dynamic range. Larry |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: dynamic ip: cold hard facts, Charles Cazabon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: dynamic ip: cold hard facts, Charles Cazabon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: dynamic ip: cold hard facts, up |
| Next by Thread: | Re: dynamic ip: cold hard facts, Charles Cazabon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |