On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 12:31:42 -0600, Josh Trutwin wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:23:26 +0200
> Sami Farin <safari-qmail@safari.iki.fi> wrote:
>
> > So, why bother with that kind of signal-to-noise ratio.
>
> Cause then you'll block my email. :)
209.18.107.89 / ptr-89.fastconcepts.net was not in my
deny list, and you can guess am I blocking the other IP
one can see in the Received header field.
as a side note, these are listed from 69.46.0.0/16 in the CBL.
as you can see, standard netblock which has trojaned users
and badly configured DNS -- and standard SNR.
but safari-qmail is not the only email address I use.
some spamtraps have no antispam whatsoever, for example.
69.46.6.163
69.46.15.216
69.46.27.153
69.46.30.78
69.46.135.17=cols694613517.cols.net=PTRNXDOMAIN
69.46.135.22=cols694613522.cols.net=PTRNXDOMAIN
69.46.135.24=cols694613524.cols.net=PTRNXDOMAIN
69.46.139.69=cols694613969.cols.net=PTRNXDOMAIN
69.46.170.1=69-46-170-1.ip.tor.radiant.net=PTRMATCH
69.46.196.88=dsl1340.en-tel.net=PTRNXDOMAIN
69.46.198.21
69.46.205.83=dhcp.205083.en-tel.net=PTRMATCH
69.46.205.132=dhcp.205132.en-tel.net=PTRMATCH
69.46.205.221=dhcp.205221.en-tel.net=PTRMATCH
69.46.208.84=dhcp.208084.en-tel.net=PTRMATCH
69.46.210.253=dhcp.210253.en-tel.net=PTRMATCH
69.46.211.230=dhcp.211230.en-tel.net=PTRMATCH
69.46.212.14=dhcp.212014.en-tel.net=PTRMATCH
69.46.213.201=dhcp.213201.en-tel.net=PTRMATCH
69.46.214.128=dhcp.214128.en-tel.net=PTRMATCH
69.46.215.59=dhcp.215059.en-tel.net=PTRMATCH
69.46.216.23=dhcp.216023.en-tel.net=PTRMATCH
69.46.216.60=dhcp.216060.en-tel.net=PTRMATCH
69.46.216.225=dhcp.216225.en-tel.net=PTRMATCH
69.46.218.82=dhcp.218082.en-tel.net=PTRNXDOMAIN
69.46.221.130=lakedalelink.net=PTRNOMATCH
69.46.221.153=lakedalelink.net=PTRNOMATCH
69.46.221.162=lakedalelink.net=PTRNOMATCH
69.46.221.172=lakedalelink.net=PTRNOMATCH
69.46.221.178=lakedalelink.net=PTRNOMATCH
--
pgp8ulPxvHafC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|