Qmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: dynamic ip: cold hard facts

To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Subject: Re: dynamic ip: cold hard facts
From: Roman Levitskiy <slayer@octavian.ru>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:54:43 +0300
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: gmail-qmail@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: sp.com.list@gmail.com
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <20070131190004.18111.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
Mail-followup-to: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <20070131164853.GA9237@discworld.dyndns.org> <20070131190004.18111.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 07:00:04PM -0000, John Levine wrote:
> ...  It sees about 50,000 messages a day, and
> get somewhere between one misfire a week and one misfire a month.
> People who reject on DNSBLs do get some feedback when people complain
> about their rejected mail, and complaints on that score are quite rare
...
> 
> There was an era when it wasn't reasonable to reject all mail from
> dynamic addresses, but that era was over several years ago.  If your
> ISP is incompetent, you have my sympathy, but that's your problem, not
> mine.
> 

 Looks like you manage home-sized domain.
 If somebody charge you to serve more than hundred users, you w'll 
be beaten for each and every failure.
If I was your boss, I'll ask you a question like:
 - Is sending from dynamic IP prohibited by any standarts ?
 - No (you can lie, but it can be easy sorted out).
 - So, what the f**k are you doing ??? Why my customer's email can't
   reach our mailboxes ???
 
--
Regards, Roman.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>