| To: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: dynamic ip: cold hard facts |
| From: | John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> |
| Date: | 31 Jan 2007 22:03:34 -0000 |
| Cc: | slayer@octavian.ru |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| In-reply-to: | <20070131205443.GA10789@abyss.home> |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| Organization: |
> Looks like you manage home-sized domain. > If somebody charge you to serve more than hundred users, you w'll > be beaten for each and every failure. I have about 850 user mailboxes, and I certainly get a certain number of complaints, but I cannot remember the last time anyone complained about losing mail due to it being sent from a dynamic address. Maybe things are different in Russia, but in North America, all the mail sent from dynamic addresses is spam. R's, John |
| Previous by Date: | Re: dynamic ip: cold hard facts, Roman Levitskiy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: dynamic ip: cold hard facts, Richard Archer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: dynamic ip: cold hard facts, Roman Levitskiy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: dynamic ip: cold hard facts, Charles Cazabon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |