Qmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: qmail - daemontools - tcpserver on Solaris 10

To: qmail <qmail@list.cr.yp.to>
Subject: Re: qmail - daemontools - tcpserver on Solaris 10
From: DAve <dave.list@pixelhammer.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:30:51 -0500
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: gmail-qmail@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: sp.com.list@gmail.com
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <45D9E5DC.1050408@pixelhammer.com>
Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <45D9C28D.1040100@pixelhammer.com> <p06210200c1ff8c9385f4@[192.168.1.22]> <45D9E5DC.1050408@pixelhammer.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
DAve wrote:
Eben wrote:
DAve wrote:

Searching is turning up NADA so far. Has anyone else been able to
compile DJB software on Solaris 10?

Yes.
I just tried compiling ucspi-tcp-0.88 on SunOS 5.10 and didn't have a problem.
I'm using Sun's GCC pkgs SUNW0gccfss and SUNW0scgfss.
There's a specific mailing list for daemontools at log@list.cr.yp.to.



I am aware, but since nothing from DJB is compiling I didn't want to cross post. I've been chided for that before.

I installed the tools from sunfreeware.com as these are the same tools I've used on all previous installs and I get the following error, building qmail this time.

./compile auto-str.c
auto-str.c:9: warning: conflicting types for built-in function 'puts'
auto-str.c: In function `main':
auto-str.c:17: warning: return type of 'main' is not `int'
./load auto-str substdio.a error.a str.a
ld: fatal: file values-Xa.o: open failed: No such file or directory
ld: fatal: File processing errors. No output written to auto-str
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `auto-str'

Gotta be a Sun package not installed. I'll go review what the tech installed when he did the OS.

DAve

Ahh, some packages are no longer installed by default with Solaris 10. I went back and added the following,

SUNWsprot
SUNWarc
SUNWbtool

And now things seem to be working.

DAve


--
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos
for other non-international holidays, but nothing for
Veterans?

Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>