Qmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [djb@koobera.math.uic.edu: qmail 1.00 available]

To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Subject: Re: [djb@koobera.math.uic.edu: qmail 1.00 available]
From: Sasa Ugrenovic <sasa@admin-networks.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:00:51 +0100
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: gmail-qmail@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: sp.com.list@gmail.com
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <20070222042303.GA74985@lizzy.catnook.local>
Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
Organization: Admin-Networks.org
References: <20070222042303.GA74985@lizzy.catnook.local>
Ok .. i have a question.

Is qmail usable ? I used qmail for 5 years before I switched to postfix.
I hope DJB reads this, because qmail is obsolete... you have to apply a million 
patches (which have backward compatibility issues) to have a decent functional 
SMTP.
Greylisting, helo checks, blabla ..

This is not a flamebait, i still use qmail/vpopmail on servers behind my MX 
processor which doesn't run qmail, since I'm not a zaelot.

Kind Regards,
Sasa

On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:23:03 -0800
Jos Backus <jos@catnook.com> wrote:

> Congratulations, Dan. On to the next 10 years...
> 
> ----- Forwarded message from "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@koobera.math.uic.edu> 
> -----
> 
> Date: 21 Feb 1997 21:38:51 -0000
> From: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@koobera.math.uic.edu>
> To: djb-qmail@koobera.math.uic.edu
> Subject: qmail 1.00 available
> 
> qmail 1.00 is available through http://pobox.com/~djb/qmail.html.
> 
> No code changes from 0.96. I have lots of cleanups scheduled, and I'll
> have to add IPv6 support someday, but 1.00 should be an adequate MTA for
> the next several years.
> 
> ---Dan
> 
> 
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> 
> -- 
> Jos Backus
> jos at catnook.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>