Qmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [djb@koobera.math.uic.edu: qmail 1.00 available]

To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Subject: Re: [djb@koobera.math.uic.edu: qmail 1.00 available]
From: Roger Merchberger <zmerch@30below.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:15:53 -0500
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: gmail-qmail@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: sp.com.list@gmail.com
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <45DDE8DA.7030102@scriptkitchen.com>
Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <20070222140051.76cdabb9.sasa@admin-networks.org> <20070222042303.GA74985@lizzy.catnook.local> <20070222140051.76cdabb9.sasa@admin-networks.org>
Rumor has it that Jeremy Kitchen may have mentioned these words:
Sasa Ugrenovic wrote:
> Ok .. i have a question.
>
> Is qmail usable ?

no.  Without helo checks and greylisting, it's a completely unreliable MTA.

I mean, who could live without helo checks?

A few years ago, I couldn't.... it was a temporarily viable way of blocking a lot of zombie botnet crap.

I haven't checked lately, but if I can disregard the advice in my .sig for a second, I doubt it does much good anymore... Unforch, I don't have the time to actually profile it.

Greylisting, what's that?

It's a way of breaking SMTP in such a way that will slow down valid mail delivery.

;-)

Laterz,
Roger "Merch" Merchberger

--
Roger "Merch" Merchberger   | "Profile, don't speculate."
SysAdmin, Iceberg Computers |     Daniel J. Bernstein
zmerch@30below.com          |


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>