Qmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [djb@koobera.math.uic.edu: qmail 1.00 available]

To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Subject: Re: [djb@koobera.math.uic.edu: qmail 1.00 available]
From: Sasa Ugrenovic <sasa@admin-networks.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:37:14 +0100
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: gmail-qmail@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: sp.com.list@gmail.com
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <3.0.6.32.20070222231359.01865900@192.168.192.1>
Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
Organization: Admin-Networks.org
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20070222151110.03804210@mail.30below.com> <20070222140051.76cdabb9.sasa@admin-networks.org> <20070222042303.GA74985@lizzy.catnook.local> <20070222140051.76cdabb9.sasa@admin-networks.org> <5.1.0.14.2.20070222151110.03804210@mail.30below.com> <3.0.6.32.20070222231359.01865900@192.168.192.1>
Of course it scores 100 % when it delivers anything that comes on it ...
But that's not acceptable for customers.

My customers received around 60 % of spam of their mail (usualy around 50-60 
spam a day, with qmail,spamassassin,rbl), that stoped when i moved away from 
qmail, and they don't complain anymore.
That's the point. To make customers happy.

Every mail that I block with helo checks(as i said before, i block around 70 % 
of mail total with it) the sender get's notified, without my server sending 
mail (bounce) back to sender, which are in majority of cases false. Spam.

For my needs (the needs that should be essential for every MX server admin) I 
need to install at least 6-7 different patches. Some of them can't work 
together unless some patch hacking.

I'm not talking about my home mail server which holds 5 domains of me and my 
friends.

Kind Regards,
Sasa


On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:13:59 +0100
Erwin Hoffmann <feh@fehcom.de> wrote:

> However, one thing remains:
> Email has to be delivered reliably. 
> And in this respect, qmail (1.0x) scores 100% -- even without patches.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>