Re: [djb@koobera.math.uic.edu: qmail 1.00 available]

[Sasa Ugrenovic <sasa@admin-networks.org>]

They would be unhappy.
But the checks done by helo checks don't discard mail from properly configured 
smtp servers. All other are rejected. And aparently majority of spam bots don't 
send mail(spam) complient to RFC xxxx standard(the same as the greylisting 
works). That's sufficient for me, since my customers accept that answer, and 
ask me to whitelist the domain if it's important.
However, this don't happen that often... i'd say, once in 6 month time...that's 
the period i moved from qmail.

User had contacted them via his(users) alternate mail account from @yahoo. 
However, that happened(was reported) only once.

If I understand, reading this all the point why qmail exists today is because 
by default there's a 0 % chance possibility it will reject valid mail ?
In a world like this... 

Kind Regards,
Sasa

On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:48:19 -0500
Uncle George <netbeans@gatworks.com> wrote:

> Sasa Ugrenovic wrote:
> 
> > That's the point. To make customers happy.
> 
> I suppose if u dont deliver any mail, your customers would continue to 
> be happy ? :}
> 
> If the sender of the (non-spam) e-mail gets rejected by your system, do 
> u have a way to correct the delivery failure via alternate e-mail means?