Re: [djb@koobera.math.uic.edu: qmail 1.00 available]

[Matthijs Willemstein <linux@willemstein.net>]

On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 11:26 -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Sasa Ugrenovic <sasa@admin-networks.org> wrote:
> > [...]
> 
> Please don't top-post.
Can not you stop complaining about that?

> > When I said "needs that should be essential for every mx server admin" I
> > didn't judge your level of knowledge, i commented (IMHO, like I stated once)
> > that those features should today be used on every MX server, or at least
> > availible.
> 
> And, as Roger said, you saying those features need to be "used on every MX
> server" is offensive to the mail administrators who have decided they do not
> need those features.
Those who feel offended should seek the cause of this with themselves. I
found Sasa was explaining things very nicely. You are only seeking to be
offended.
 
> Instead, say "I believe *I* need these features in my environment, because
> ..." and stop assuming things about what other mail admins need.
That is what he said, is not it? At least IMHO IMHO means just that. But
then again I am not a native English speaker.

You should lighten up a bit Charles.

> Charles
Matthijs