Qmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: qmail Patch Repository

To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Subject: Re: qmail Patch Repository
From: Seth Kurtzberg <seth@cql.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 06:08:30 -0500
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: gmail-qmail@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: sp.com.list@gmail.com
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <63468F4B-5F96-4F92-8D57-31226CB78053@schmonz.com>
Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
Organization: CQL
References: <20070223194325.GW27139@c-76-18-79-168.hsd1.nm.comcast.net> <ed48d1f18e95b2284f1a0ccd57c6d8b2@localhost> <20070223212305.GC27139@c-76-18-79-168.hsd1.nm.comcast.net> <63468F4B-5F96-4F92-8D57-31226CB78053@schmonz.com>
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 02:05:32 -0500
Amitai Schlair <schmonz@schmonz.com> wrote:
> 
> Being merely a collection of references means we wouldn't need any  
> particular special cooperation from patch authors, though we would  
> rely on their publishing their patches at stable URLs. Presumably  
> they'd be willing to do that, if they don't already, in order to be  
> included in the "repository."

Using del.icio.us doesn't prevent you from having a page on some other server 
to hold those patches whose authors don't have the resources to publish for 
some reason.

> 
> I don't see that del.icio.us can track bookmark destinations for  
> content updates. But they do provide XML and HTML export mechanisms,  
> either of which is enough to independently script a periodic scraping  
> of patch URLs.
> 
> Here's a first stab at it:
> 
>      <URL:http://del.icio.us/qmail.patch.repository>
> 
> Thoughts?
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>