Qmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: qmail Patch Repository

To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Subject: Re: qmail Patch Repository
From: Sasa Ugrenovic <sasa@admin-networks.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 01:47:10 +0100
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: gmail-qmail@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: sp.com.list@gmail.com
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <45E4CD34.3020308@jeremykister.com>
Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
Organization: Admin-Networks.org
References: <45E4CD34.3020308@jeremykister.com>
There was a talk about this.
I'll copy/paste:

By Allen Brooker:
---------
As far as I can tell, qmail is now unmaintained by djb and the website 
doesn't appear to have been updated recently (at a guess, atleast in the 
past couple of years). On top of this, qmail's license unfortunately 
means that no one can take over qmail or fork it any way (would a "fully 
featured" fork that some admins seem to want be such a bad thing?)

While there's nothing inherently wrong with applying patches to a base 
code set, applying patches, especially patches on top of already patched 
code, surely introduces an inherent risk of introducing bugs and other 
flaws that might be avoided if the patches were being submitted to a 
central code base which evaluated each patch before applying it to a 
central code base?

While djb's security guarantee looks good, how can I know that if there 
is a vulnerabiltiy found, that it will be patched in a timely manner and 
in a way that won't compromise the security or stability of qmail 
further? How can I know that vulnerabilities haven't already been found 
and just been ignored / lost because djb has no time to maintain qmail?
----------

There's a lot of the same patches (not compatible), broken links.. etc.
Central qmail patch web site would be a good thing, imho, again.

If we do something like ./do --with-ldap --with-helochecks etc. which generates 
(from patches suplied on repository) one big patch that will without errors 
patch qmail source, that will be a pretty damn good thing. But as Jeremy 
Kitchen said, we'll discuss that later.

Kind Regarrds,
Sasa


On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:30:44 -0500
Jeremy Kister <qmail-05@jeremykister.com> wrote:

> On 2/27/2007 6:45 PM, Amitai Schlair wrote:
> > Does anyone agree, disagree, want to pitch in?
> 
> I don't see the benefit of taking people away from qmail.org and
> qmailwiki.org.
> 
> Either site can and does list patches from a plethora of hosts,
> including freshmeat and sourceforge.  What does
> "awebsitededicatedtojustqmailpatches.tld" buy a qmail user besides one
> more place to look ?
> 
> -- 
> 
> Jeremy Kister
> http://jeremy.kister.net./
> 
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>