| To: | Sasa Ugrenovic <sasa@admin-networks.org>, qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: qmail Patch Repository |
| From: | Feizhou <feizhou@graffiti.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:46:11 +0800 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| In-reply-to: | <20070228014710.11f9d0ed.sasa@admin-networks.org> |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <45E4CD34.3020308@jeremykister.com> <20070228014710.11f9d0ed.sasa@admin-networks.org> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) |
While djb's security guarantee looks good, how can I know that if there is a vulnerabiltiy found, that it will be patched in a timely manner and in a way that won't compromise the security or stability of qmail further? How can I know that vulnerabilities haven't already been found and just been ignored / lost because djb has no time to maintain qmail?---------- Sorry, plenty have had a go at this and as yet, no one has managed to find a vulnerability. So if you are through, please go hit the exim, postfix or even sendmail websites and get yourself a solution that you will not complain about. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [djb@koobera.math.uic.edu: qmail 1.00 available], Feizhou |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: qmail Patch Repository, Amitai Schlair |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: qmail Patch Repository, Sasa Ugrenovic |
| Next by Thread: | Re: qmail Patch Repository, Amitai Schlair |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |