Re: qmail Patch Repository

[Fabio Busatto <fabio.busatto@sikurezza.org>]

On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:12:03AM -0800, Peter Serwe wrote:
> This isn't how a linux kernel (bloat :P) is built, but it is how 
> something like a FreeBSD
> (very free) is built.  Then I wouldn't mind an option to save that to a 
> different filename
> so that from one source tree, I could do something on the order of:
> 
> # make build iloveqmail QMAILCONF=STANDALONE
> ...
> # make install iloveqmail QMAILCONF=STANDALONE
> 
> or
> 
> # make build iloveqmail QMAILCONF=CLUSTER1
> 
> This way, I could run it under *BSD or *nix at my choosing, and
> have the same patchset.

Oh, no os-wars please :)
I maybe want to say "like busybox", not "like linux kernel", is it better? :)
By the way the "busybox" configuration and compilation system is not os 
dependent,
no arch dependent and pretty cool :)
All these details are not critical in this phase, I've an open mind and your
solution is surely as good as mine.

Join at iloveqmail-subscribe@pkcrew.org mailing list, and let's start fun.

Bye
Fabio