| To: | "qmail list" <qmail@list.cr.yp.to> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: qmail license question |
| From: | "Matt Thoene" <thoene@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:53:12 -0800 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=npRlA0BUJbuYUf8vbQNNWkjRtxsw4VeIKh+bT7IJ4q9o+P9Croa0SeAgQvRn/u+dq8+1vkJZdtr2hrsQgTSvALazGGMMe50zAtVpobmNTid1qJ58PE4fSh7DhRx/KjRdqg81zO0brEQnBYZoc5kjy9cJVUH6JHcooCnpSupkAcM= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pT/fT56DH/ePJ3iZNAy4nN98HC3n8cZurSPgQ3rBtzBYN9Gw7TpeQb+2sL7ycZFQCBmbPclB62QhyhmAlP+f1YaBHFqwm8fnlPne54g+9dktpdqayW7hD0zOuPfVh1bXv4oXw7C5B7OhePySgh4QycUhvFmhvlU2Qobw3p/yuXU= |
| Domainkey-status: | good (test mode) |
| In-reply-to: | <20070307214803.GH2924@c-76-18-79-168.hsd1.nm.comcast.net> |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <924f29280703071315o25bcb3b1vf1054c19dbcad37a@mail.gmail.com> <20070307214803.GH2924@c-76-18-79-168.hsd1.nm.comcast.net> |
On 3/7/07, Kyle Wheeler <kyle-qmail@memoryhole.net> wrote: You're probably thinking of Plesk, and the exact status of what they have done is really rather nebulous (DJB has never clarified). Our only assumption can be that Plesk is distributing binaries that appear qmail-esque, and nothing more. Plesk. I'm forced to use a qmail Plesk setup and it is extremely frustrating. -- Matt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Info] Greetdelay Presentation GUUG FFG 2007, Georgi Georgiev |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OT] qmail license question -- Yahoo, Matthew R. Dempsky |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OT] qmail license question -- Yahoo, Russ Nelson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Let's start working! (Re: qmail Patch Repository), Russ Nelson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |