Qmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OT] qmail license question -- Yahoo

To: qmail list <qmail@list.cr.yp.to>
Subject: Re: [OT] qmail license question -- Yahoo
From: Kyle Wheeler <kyle-qmail@memoryhole.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:41:08 -0700
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: gmail-qmail@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: sp.com.list@gmail.com
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=memoryhole.net; b=YQIQ2H1vAAQ9U6ORSBh3gnGZ5mZ0A5rZFMq+ocqlhLHG2lcaNycgJAvMY0S8X5KKvlZexjUsxCt83Ow7I5RWIV26GLiES9TY81gphQprfK0M38bESDl+dmYhKwggR7bcZu4OK5E4/jiLEBc3QMWFrf6SP/KA3RtnlYbT5OmHXmc= ;
Domainkey-status: good
In-reply-to: <45EF7877.6020808@graffiti.net>
Mail-followup-to: qmail list <qmail@list.cr.yp.to>
Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <924f29280703071315o25bcb3b1vf1054c19dbcad37a@mail.gmail.com> <924f29280703071315o25bcb3b1vf1054c19dbcad37a@mail.gmail.com> <3.0.6.32.20070307231549.00bd2e10@192.168.192.1> <20070307223832.GL2924@c-76-18-79-168.hsd1.nm.comcast.net> <45EF7877.6020808@graffiti.net>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-03-06)
On Thursday, March  8 at 10:44 AM, quoth Feizhou:
Just issue a help command during the smtp session. That will answer the question :)

Not entirely. For the record, Yahoo's server's respond to the HELP command with this:

    250 Okay. Yahoo! MTA

But, on the other hand, that string is just a single line of qmail (line 72 of qmail-smtpd.c): very easy to change. If I was interested in obfuscating what server I was using, that's a simple cosmetic change. What makes one think that it's possible that it's an obfuscated qmail is the other similarities that it has to qmail. For example, it's response to EHLO is the same as qmail with the SIZE patch (sendmail, for example, usually has a lot more to say, and in different orders). Which could mean that they just happened to implement theirs the same way, or could mean that it's qmail with a different HELP response.

If you want a slightly better idea, you have to look for something that's a bit more of a pain to change, like 8BITMIME support. If it is important to someone that it be correct, it seems more likely that they would either use someone else's server or write their own. But, if it's incorrect in the same way that qmail's is incorrect, it's rather unlikely that it's a different server.

~Kyle
--
Asking whether machines can think is like asking whether submarines can swim.
                                                            -- Unknown

Attachment: pgpKo0KtWOVxZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>